
In industries like oil and gas, chemicals, and nuclear, where the stakes are high, a Facility Safety Case is a vital tool for ensuring safety and compliance. This comprehensive document demonstrates how a facility identifies, assesses, and controls major accident hazards to protect workers, the environment, and surrounding communities. Developing a robust safety case is not just a regulatory requirement but a commitment to operational excellence and risk management. In this article, we’ll explore the purpose, components, and process of Facility Safety Case development, with practical insights into how Cormat Group achieve safety excellence.
A Facility Safety Case is a structured document that provides a detailed argument, supported by evidence, that a facility is safe to operate. It identifies potential major accident hazards (MAHs), assesses their risks, and outlines control measures to ensure risks are reduced to As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP). The safety case is a cornerstone of regulations like the UK’s Control of Major Accident Hazards (COMAH) for chemical facilities or the Offshore Safety Case Regulations for oil and gas platforms.
The safety case goes beyond a checklist of safety measures. It tells a story of how a facility understands its risks, implements controls, and maintains a culture of safety. For example, a refinery’s safety case might detail how it prevents gas leaks, mitigates fire risks, and prepares for emergencies. It’s a living document, updated regularly to reflect changes in operations, regulations, or lessons learned from incidents.
The importance of a Facility Safety Case lies in its ability to systematically manage risks and demonstrate due diligence. Here are key reasons why it matters:
A 2021 study by the UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that facilities with comprehensive safety cases had a 35% lower rate of major incidents compared to those with weaker documentation, underscoring their value.
A Facility Safety Case is structured to provide a clear, evidence-based argument for safety. Key components include:
This section outlines the facility’s operations, processes, and infrastructure. It includes details like the types of hazardous substances handled, equipment used, and operational conditions. For example, a chemical plant might describe its storage tanks, pipelines, and processing units.
The safety case identifies all potential MAHs, such as fires, explosions, or toxic releases. Each hazard is assessed for its likelihood and consequences using tools like Bow-Tie Analysis or Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) studies.
This involves evaluating the severity and probability of MAHs. Risk matrices or quantitative risk assessments (QRAs) help prioritize hazards and determine whether risks are ALARP.
The safety case details preventive and mitigative controls, such as safety-critical equipment (e.g., gas detectors, pressure relief valves) and systems (e.g., emergency shutdown protocols). These are often linked to Health, Safety, and Environment Critical Equipment and Systems (HSECES).
The SMS outlines how the facility manages safety, including policies, training, maintenance, and incident reporting. It demonstrates a proactive approach to risk management.
This section describes on-site and off-site emergency plans, including evacuation procedures, communication protocols, and coordination with local authorities. It ensures preparedness for worst-case scenarios.
The safety case must show that risks are reduced to ALARP, balancing the cost of additional controls against the risk reduction achieved. This often includes cost-benefit analyses and comparisons with industry standards.
Independent verification, such as audits or third-party reviews, ensures that control measures are effective and HSECES meet performance standards.
Developing a Facility Safety Case is a collaborative, iterative process that requires technical expertise and stakeholder engagement. Here’s a step-by-step guide:
Senior management must champion the safety case, allocating resources and setting clear objectives. Their support ensures the process is prioritized and integrated into operations.
Collect detailed information about the facility’s operations, including process flows, hazardous substances, and equipment specifications. This forms the foundation of the facility description.
Use risk assessment tools like HAZOP, Bow-Tie Analysis, or Fault Tree Analysis to identify MAHs. Engage frontline workers, engineers, and safety experts to capture diverse perspectives. For example, a gas platform might identify a pipeline rupture as an MAH.
Evaluate the likelihood and consequences of each MAH. Use qualitative tools (e.g., risk matrices) or quantitative methods (e.g., QRAs) to assess risks and prioritize control measures.
Identify preventive controls (e.g., regular maintenance, safety interlocks) and mitigative controls (e.g., fire suppression systems, spill containment). Link these to HSECES and specify performance standards, such as response times or reliability targets.
Document the SMS, including policies, training programs, and maintenance schedules. Ensure it aligns with standards like ISO 45001 or COMAH requirements.
Develop detailed emergency response plans for on-site and off-site scenarios. Include evacuation procedures, communication protocols, and coordination with emergency services. Conduct drills to test effectiveness.
Show that risks are reduced to ALARP through a combination of control measures, cost-benefit analyses, and industry benchmarks. Document the decision-making process to withstand regulatory scrutiny.
Involve employees, contractors, and regulators in the safety case development. Workshops, reviews, and feedback sessions ensure the document reflects real-world conditions and meets expectations.
Conduct internal and external audits to verify that control measures and HSECES meet performance standards. Independent reviews add credibility and identify gaps.
Submit the safety case to regulators (e.g., HSE or Environment Agency) for approval, if required. Share key findings with employees to foster a safety culture. Cormat Group ensure their safety cases are accessible and understood by all teams.
Treat the safety case as a living document. Review it regularly to reflect changes in operations, regulations, or lessons from incidents. Schedule updates at least every five years or after significant changes.
Facility Safety Case development is a critical process for managing risks in high-hazard industries. By systematically identifying major accident hazards, assessing risks, and implementing robust control measures, safety cases ensure facilities operate safely and compliantly. Cormat Group demonstrate how a well-crafted safety case fosters a culture of safety, protects stakeholders, and meets regulatory demands. While challenges like complexity and resource demands exist, stakeholder engagement, technology, and regular updates can overcome them. As industries evolve, safety cases will remain a cornerstone of risk management, driving safer, more resilient operations.
Please get in touch with our specialist.
Sultan International Tower
P.O. Box 41233,
Abu Dhabi, U.A.E.
Landline: +971 2 622 3535 Ext: 303
Cormat-Al Bunyan Vision Contracting
131 street, Al Muruj, Abha, KSA
Building 2,
Guildford Business
Park Road, Guildford.
Surrey. UK. GU2 8XG.
Sultan International Tower
P.O. Box 41233,
Abu Dhabi, U.A.E.
Landline: +971 2 622 3535 Ext: 303
Cormat-Al Bunyan Vision Contracting
131 street, Al Muruj, Abha, KSA
Copyright 2025 Cormat Group | All Rights Reserved | Certified : ISO 9001